Legal Opinion
Cox v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 5, 1984No. 59020PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
Certiorari has been granted for the purpose of determining whether a narrative statement, drafted by an attorney, properly authenticated, filed timely and served upon a pro se litigant who failed to object or file proposed amendments, should be considered as part of the record on appeal. We find that a pro se party’s failure to object or propose amendments to a narrative statement, filed properly under the rules of appellate procedure, 12 O.S.1981, Ch. 15, App. 2, Rule 1.22, does not preclude the inclusion of the narrative statement from the record on appeal.
Laramie Cox,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Gilkes v. GilkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- West v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 2, McClain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Western Steel Erection Company v. GatlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Fidelity Laboratories, Inc. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Boston v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Soldan v. Stone VideoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.