Legal Opinion

Hamid v. Sew Original

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1982No. 55691PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice:(1) This was a small claim by appellee [plaintiff] to recover $150 “for sewing”. Within the time allowed by law the appellant, Sew Original [one of the defendants below], filed a counterclaim by and through its general manager, Jean E. Wahl [the co-defendant], to recover $290 for the expense of reworking garments and for the value of “ruined garments”. So far as the record discloses, both the plaintiff’s claim and the counterclaim were reached for trial without a jury on July 25, 1980. Judgment for $100 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant achieved no recovery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tobin v. HolmboeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Gilkes v. GilkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Needham v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Fidelity Laboratories, Inc. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Seidenbach's v. Crown Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API