Legal Opinion

Soldan v. Stone Video

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1999No. 89,616PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 The case before the Court presents no questions of law which are not already addressed by Oklahoma’s extant jurisprudence. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in its denial of Stone Video d/b/a PC Tech’s [employer or Stone] motion for new trial. The basis of Stone’s motion is that the small claims judgment rendered below was “clearly against the weight of the evidence.”

I

PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS

¶ 2 Soldán [employee or plaintiff] brought a small claims action to recover unpaid wages and commissions. In early 1997 Sol- dan made demand on employer for a salary increase.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Black v. LittletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Maras v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Western Steel Erection Company v. GatlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Jones, Givens, Gotcher & Bogan, P.C. v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Lerma v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Hagen v. Independent School District No. 1-004Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API