Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GMBH v. Virostek
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Steffen, J.:
Respondent, Frank Virostek, suffered permanent brain damage as a result of injuries sustained on May 24, 1983, in an accident that occurred while riding his Sachs moped. The two primary issues on appeal concern the effect of NRCP 10(a) 1 on the substitution of accurately identified parties for defendants bearing fictitious names after the applicable statute of limitations has run, and the propriety of the award of $300,000 in attorney’s fees to Virostek. We are persuaded that existing case law concerning the first issue is unsound or in need of clarification;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Servatius v. United Resort Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Hill v. Summa CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Lunn v. American Maintenance Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sparks v. Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Costello v. CaslerNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Alires v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Temple v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.