Legal Opinion

Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GMBH v. Virostek

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1991No. 21110PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

Respondent, Frank Virostek, suffered permanent brain damage as a result of injuries sustained on May 24, 1983, in an accident that occurred while riding his Sachs moped. The two primary issues on appeal concern the effect of NRCP 10(a) 1 on the substitution of accurately identified parties for defendants bearing fictitious names after the applicable statute of limitations has run, and the propriety of the award of $300,000 in attorney’s fees to Virostek. We are persuaded that existing case law concerning the first issue is unsound or in need of clarification;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Servatius v. United Resort Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hill v. Summa CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lunn v. American Maintenance Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Costello v. CaslerNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Alires v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Temple v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API