Calloway v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal follows the complex construction defect litigation that arose out of alleged defects in the Huffaker Hills Townhouse Development in Reno. Charles Calloway and Marlene Iacometti are class representatives, representing the class of 164 townhouse owners in Huffaker Hills who brought the underlying lawsuit (“appellants”).
Appellants asserted that their homes were built with defective framing that was responsible for extensive water damage from rain and snow. As a result, appellants sought recovery based upon warranty and tort theories. On October 30, 1989, appellants filed their…
3Cases cited34 opinions
- Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Olson v. RichardNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Aas v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.