Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of America

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1989No. 17625PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*241OPINION

2Per curiam

On October 26, 1988, in an opinion authored by former Chief Justice E. M. Gunderson,1 this court unanimously concluded that substantial evidence supported the jury’s assessment of $5,939,500 in punitive damages against respondent Combined Insurance Company of America (Combined). Accordingly, we reversed the district court’s judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict, reinstated the jury’s assessment of punitive damages against Combined, and affirmed the district court’s denial of Combined’s motion for a new trial. See Ainsworth v. Combined Ins. Co., 104 Nev. 587, 763 P.2d 673 (1988).

Pu…

3Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by50 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Powers v. United Services Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Evans v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API