Legal Opinion

Hill v. Summa Corporation

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1974No. 7319PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

Appellant Hill, one of several defendants in an action respondent Summa Corporation commenced in Clark County, has appealed an order denying his motion to change venue to Nye County, where he resides.1 We affirm the district court.

In addition to designating appellant Hill and several others as defendants under their actual names, the complaint by which *80respondent Summa Corporation commenced its action also designated a number of “John Doe” defendants by fictitious names, as permitted by NRCP 10(a).2 Thereafter, since no named defendant lived in Clark County,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. National Maritime Union of America v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Stocks v. StocksNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Williams v. KellerNevada Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GMBH v. VirostekNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kiehn v. Nelsen's Tire CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Lunn v. American Maintenance Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lacey v. Wen-Neva, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API