United States v. Mixson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The issue raised on reconsideration in this petition is the retroactive effect, if any, of the holding of this Court in United States v. Newcomb, 5 M.J. 4 (C.M.A.1978). In that opinion this Court ruled that a court-martial was improperly constituted when the military judge and counsel were assigned to that forum by a staff judge advocate acting by delegation and on behalf of the convening authority. See Article 26, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 826. We believe this decision embraced the first clearly articulated interpretation of this statute on the granted…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. SaundersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. ShearerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. ArvieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. GordonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.