Legal Opinion

United States v. Gordon

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 28, 1979No. SPCM 13774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FULTON, Senior Judge:

In the context of a special court-martial convened by a general court-martial convening authority and empowered to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge,1 we are asked to determine that Army regulations pertaining to the appointment of judges to courts-martial unlawfully interfere with the convening authority’s statutory obligation to personally detail the trial judge. We decline to so hold.

Appellant’s trial by special court-martial was presided over by Captain James D. McManus, Jr., as the military trial judge. His detail was evidenced by Court-Martial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. NewcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. MixsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. LivingstonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. TreadwellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. JudsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. HumphreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. CowlesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. BurumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API