United States v. Gordon
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
In the context of a special court-martial convened by a general court-martial convening authority and empowered to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge,1 we are asked to determine that Army regulations pertaining to the appointment of judges to courts-martial unlawfully interfere with the convening authority’s statutory obligation to personally detail the trial judge. We decline to so hold.
Appellant’s trial by special court-martial was presided over by Captain James D. McManus, Jr., as the military trial judge. His detail was evidenced by Court-Martial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. NewcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. MixsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. LivingstonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. TreadwellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. JudsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. HumphreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. CowlesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. BurumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990