Legal Opinion

White v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 2002No. 02-284PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

On March 26, 2002, petitioner, Robert White, filed a petition captioned "An Original Action for Immediate Review and Such Other Relief to Which He May be Entitled under Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution and its Implementing Act 877 of 1999 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 7-9-501 -507 (Repl. 2000)) and under Art. 16, § 13 of the Arkansas Constitution.” In his petition, White names as respondents: all Supreme Court Justices, individually and in his or her official capacity; the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the State Treasurer, in their official…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Franz Ex Rel. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Shannon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Hooker v. HaslamTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ligon v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Villines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. KosinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API