Legal Opinion

Ligon v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 2007No. 04-1395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Mr. R.S. McCullough filed a motion to abate a $550 fine imposed on him from the Professional Conduct Committee. In his motion for abatement, McCullough argues that he is indigent and cannot pay the fine. However, intermingled into his substantive request for abatement, Mr. McCullough uses unnecessary, strident, and disrespectful language toward Mr. Stark Ligón, who represents the Committee on Professional Conduct as its Executive Director and attorney (officer of the court). Examples of Mr. McCullough’s remarks follow, and we note that Mr. McCullough, throughout his motion, refers to Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLemore v. ElliotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. White v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. White v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Exigence, LLC v. BaylarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. KosinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API