Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. Kosin

I concur in the decision of the majority to affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to set aside the judgment under Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(4) (2012) and to affirm the circuit court’s finding that Kosin was the prevailing party and entitled to attorneys’ fees. However, I respectfully dissent from the holding that there were duplicative fees and from the decision to refer attorney Cornwell to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

114The majority holds that Cornwell’s fees, from the date attorney Clay became attorney of record through October 12, 2009, “represent…