Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Floyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1934No. Docket No. 1421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

On September 20, 1926, J. A. Floyd executed a written authority to appellant to act as broker in the sale of a twenty-acre orange grove in San Bernardino County, upon which he and his wife lived. Appellant took several prospective purchasers to the property and on September 17, 1926, informed Mr. Floyd that he had an offer of purchase from J. D. Whitted and Ruth Esther Whitted, his wife, and tendered a certified check for $1,000 to apply on the purchase price. The written offer bore the signature “ J. D. Whitted by H. S. Abbott, his attorney in fact”. Some question was raised as to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Merzoian v. KludjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Alison v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Coger v. WiltseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. McCarthy v. GriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Peter M. Chalik & Associates v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dreyfuss v. BolingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Rivadell, Inc. v. RazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Record Realty, Inc. v. HullCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API