Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Islais Co., Ltd. v. Matheson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1935No. S. F. 15216PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Application for writ of mandate to compel the respondent to accept a certain sum of money in full payment of an assessment levied for reclamation purposes. Six other applications involving assessments on other tracts have been filed by the petitioner. There are no disputed questions of fact.

The petitioner is the owner of several tracts of land within the Islais Creek Reclamation District. On June 29, 1928, the district caused an assessment to be levied on all the lands in the district for reclamation purposes, in the sum of $1,620,150. Thereafter the property owners in the district voted for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Butts Ragan v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hales v. SnowdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Sutter Basin Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Shouse v. QuinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State School Building Finance Committee v. BettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API