Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. . Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

We do not think tbat either one of tbe exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant can be sustained. As to tbe first: N. C. Code, 1931 (Micbie), sec. 573(1), is as follows: “Where tbe parties do not consent, tbe court may, upon tbe application of either, or of its own motion,.direct a reference in tbe following cases: (1) Where tbe trial of an issue of fact requires tbe examination of a long account on either side; in which case tbe referee may be directed to bear and decide tbe whole issue, or to report upon any specific question of fact involved therein.”

Tbe pleading of plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Baker v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Booker v. Town of HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Gurganus v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Bartlett v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Long v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API