Legal Opinion

Booker v. Town of Highlands

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 12, 1930PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating the case: It may be conceded that up to the time plaintiff filed his exceptions to the report of the referee, the defendant had preserved its right to a jury trial, as an examination of the record discloses that ojection was duly entered to the order of reference, and, on the coming in of the referee’s report, exceptions were filed thereto in apt time, appropriate issues properly tendered, and a jury trial demanded on the issues thus tendered and raised by the pleadings. Brown v. Broadhurst, 197 N. C., 738, 150 S. E., 355.

■The appeal, therefore, presents the single…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Baker v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Yelverton v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Ogden v. Appalachian Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Alley v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Gaither v. Albemarle Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API