Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the dismissal on the pleadings of certain employment-related claims against respondent Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota and the university’s athletic director, respondent Joel Maturi. Because we conclude that the district court correctly determined that judicial consideration of appellant’s estoppel counts is only available by writ of certiorari and that appellant’s constitutional counts failed to present a claim for which relief could be granted, we affirm in part. Because we conclude that the district court erred in determining at the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Nexus v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Hebert v. Winona CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.