Legal Opinion

Riss v. Angel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1997No. 63898-5PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Members of the Mercia Heights homeowners’ association rejected Plaintiffs’ building plans under a consent to construction clause in the subdivision’s restrictive covenants. The trial court held that the association’s rejection of the plans was unreasonable and arbitrary. The trial court further held the members jointly and severally liable for delay damages and attorney fees. The Court of Appeals affirmed and the homeowners sought review. We likewise affirm, but remand for determination of which individual association members shall be jointly and severally liable.

In 1992, Plaintiffs William…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dutcher v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API