Legal Opinion

Brian McMonagle v. Don Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2015No. 12-15360PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

Brian McMonagle seeks federal habeas review of a California misdemeanor conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. The district court dismissed McMonagle’s petition as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), and he appealed. In order to determine the timeliness of McMonagle’s petition, we must decide when his misdemeanor conviction became final for the purposes of AEDPA’s one-year limitation period.

This timeliness inquiry is complicated by the overlap of California’s procedures for direct review of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Charles Branham v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Flores-Haro v. SladeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  3. (HC) Hernandez v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Murphy v. Attorney General of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Singanonh v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API