Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Henry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 1995No. 94-941PublishedCited by 2,616 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, a rector and dean of a church day school, was tried and convicted in state court of sexually molesting a 5-year-old student. At trial, respondent objected to testimony by the parent of another child who claimed to have been molested 20 years previously. His objection was based on Cal. Evid. Code Ann. §352 (West 1966). On direct appeal, he pursued his evidentiary objection and requested the appellate court to find that the error was a “miscarriage of justice” under the California Constitution. California ap*365plies this provision in determining whether or not an error was harmless.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Robert E. Henry v. Wayne Estelle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2,616 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

2,611 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API