Legal Opinion

Charles Branham v. State of Montana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2021No. 19-35829PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES IVAN BRANHAM, No. 19-35829 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 9:18-cv-00059- DLC-KLD STATE OF MONTANA; PATRICK MCTIGHE, Respondents-Appellees, OPINION and JIM SALMONSEN, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 10, 2020 Portland, Oregon Filed May 6, 2021 2 BRANHAM V. STATE OF MONTANA Before: Michael R. Murphy, * Mark J. Bennett, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Miller SUMMARY **…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Antonio Doyle v. Terry RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Christopher Shane Rivera v. Jeffrey MacomberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  3. Dones v. AllisonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. Francis v. Commissioner of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  5. Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. HillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API