Legal Opinion

Flores-Haro v. Slade

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 3, 2016No. Case No. 3:12-cv-01616-MOPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, United States Chief District Judge

Cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex. When the reason for the law ceases to exist, so, effectively, does the law. The usual setting for this maxim is regulatory law: when, for example, there is a reduced speed limit near a school, then if the school ceases to be a school the lower speed limit should end. But unless we are talking about a bright line prophylactic rule like Miranda, this same principle applies to case law.

In this ease, the law involved is known as the Heck doctrine, from Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Frederick Jackson v. Michael BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. John Wesley SMITHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert TOWERY; John A. Knight; Scott McGregor, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (PC) King v. VillegasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Fernandez v. DuarteDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  3. Watts v. NovakDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API