Legal Opinion

West Philadelphia Buick Co. v. Shuster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1935No. Appeal, 300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The defendant, a landlord, caused a distress to be made by a constable on property of the plaintiff, his •tenant, for rent claimed to be in arrears. Thereupon plaintiff brought this action in replevin and took possession of the property seized and the cause came to trial before a jury. The question involved arises out of a claim by the tenant that the rent was reduced by defendant for the months for which rent was claimed.

In November, 1927, defendant made a written lease to plaintiff of a tenement on Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, for which he was to receive from it rent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Lincoln Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Lovekin v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Howard v. BovermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Aronsky v. Byron Silk Mills, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stoner v. Sley System GaragesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Burke v. Schaefer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2013
  4. Hoff EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API