Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Sley System Garages

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1946No. Appeal, 44PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff and defendant were landlord and tenant under the terms of a written lease. For rent alleged to be in arrears, amounting to $3,491.70 plaintiff filed an amicable action of ejectment, with a confession of judgment. Defendant obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment for possession and the sum of money should not be opened, and defendant let into a defense. After a full hearing the rule was discharged by the court en banc, and defendant appealed. Possession having since been secured by the landlord under the terms of the lease, that question is now moot.

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Schuy'l T. Co. v. Sobolewski Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Pellegrene v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Wilcox v. RegesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Ahrens v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API