Howard v. Boverman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 140, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 2755, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of T. Reece Howard v. H. Boverman and I. Slubin. Rule to open judgment. Error assigned was order making absolute rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head,' J.,
The plaintiff was the owner of certain basement premises in the City of PMladelpMa wkicli he demised to the defendants under a written lease. By the terms of the instrument the rent reserved was twenty-five dollars per month. At the expiration of the first year the defendants held over and the lease, by its terms, was renewed for another year*. The lease contained a warrant of attorney authorizing the lessor, at any time when the rent should be in arrears, to begin an amicable action of ejectment to recover the possession of the premises and to confess judgment in such…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- West Philadelphia Buick Co. v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Sciabia v. Peters, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1932