Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2005No. A04-973PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY, Judge. **
Appellant-father T.F.H. challenges the termination of his parental rights, making various arguments regarding the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-63 (2000), procedural matters, evi-dentiary rulings, and appointment of counsel. Because the district court did not misapply the law, make findings unsup ported by the record, or otherwise abuse its discretion, we affirm.
FACTS
J.B. (mother) is the mother of the three children who were the subject of this proceeding in district court. She is an Indian parent within the meaning of the Indian Child Welfare…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Josh L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Interest of M.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- In re the Welfare of J.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.