In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant S.W. challenges termination of her parental rights to her children, T.W. and G.W., arguing that the district court erred by (1) finding appellant palpably unfit; (2) finding that reasonable and active efforts to unify the family had failed; (3) admitting expert testimony from an unqualified witness and giving that testimony too much weight; and (4) denying a petition to invalidate the termination of parental rights proceedings based on Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) violations that occurred during earlier temporary foster placement proceedings.
FACTS
Appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- D.E.D. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re the Welfare of L.A.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Welfare of S.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. P.S.E.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Nicole B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- In Re Nicole B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.