Legal Opinion
Hansson v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 3, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0500PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Tore Hansson, D.D.S. (Hansson) was licensed to practice dentistry in Arizona under a limited license according to Ariz.Rev. Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 32-1233(D) (1986). In 1995, the legislature repealed this section and the Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners (Board) notified Hansson that his license would not be renewable. The trial court found that the repeal of the statute did not divest Hansson of his status as a dentist. For the following reasons, we reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 On December 12, 1988, Hansson was licensed to practice…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- LaFaro v. CahillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Winters v. Arizona Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015