Legal Opinion
LaFaro v. Cahill
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 22, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 01-0084PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Is an injunction against harassment that restricts protected political speech unconstitutional? May an Arizona statute that authorizes injunctions against harassment be given an interpretation that renders it constitutional? We answer these questions in the affirmative.
¶ 2 Dennis Cahill appeals from an injunction against harassment, issued by the trial court, that precludes him from initiating “in person” contact with A.J. LaFaro. For the reasons discussed herein, we vacate the injunction against Cahill.
BACKGROUND
¶ 3 LaFaro was the chairman of Citizens to Recall Neil…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mahar v. Acuna, IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Congress Elementary School District No. 17 v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Agfd v. ScheelerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.