Legal Opinion

City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources Board

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 10, 2012No. 2011-067PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Defendants appeal from a judgment ruling that the City of Montpelier may prohibit boating, fishing, and swimming in Berlin Pond, a public body of water located outside the City and used as the City’s drinking water supply. The City contends that the restrictions are supported by both a state health order and the powers granted to the City by the State. The trial court agreed and issued a permanent injunction preventing defendants from engaging in the listed recreational activities and from trespassing upon land surrounding the pond that is owned by the City. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Charles Ferry v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  3. Jarvis v. National CityKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kurt Daims & Craig Newbert v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. David Demarest v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API