Legal Opinion
Hollowell v. Cincinnati Ventilating Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided April 29, 2010No. Civil Action 09-121-DLBPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.
After he was terminated in December 2007, Plaintiff, Todd Hollowell, commenced this action against his former employer Defendants Cincinnati Ventilating Company (“CVC”) and its pension plans alleging age and disability discrimination as well as numerous violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), including breach of fiduciary duty, violation of ERISA’s anti-cutback provision, and discrimination under ERISA § 510. Plaintiff further alleges procedural violations of ERISA…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Huff v. Firstenergy Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Atchison v. Hubbell Industrial Controls, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Gibson v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Gibson v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.