Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 8, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00043Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM EGBERT GIBSON, ET AL. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-43-RGJ FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs William Gibson and Judy Gibson (“Gibsons”) filed a Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgment. [DE 83]. Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Conduent, Inc. (“Conduent”) responded. [DE 88; DE 89]. The Gibsons replied. [DE 90]. The motion is ripe. For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The relevant facts are in this Court’s previous order [DE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Leisure Caviar, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.