Legal Opinion
Teall v. Roeser
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, J.:
The plaintiff has commenced an action by the service of a summons and has been denied an examination of the defendant to enable the plaintiff to frame a complaint. The plaintiff in his affidavit upon which the application was based stated among other things that he and the defendant agreed to work together to find real estate satisfactory to a certain prospective purchaser and sell the same to him, any profits or commissions arising out of any sale or sales to that particular purchaser to be divided between them equally; that the parties entered upon the performance of the agreement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Felbel v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Burleigh v. BevinNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- Heye v. American Chemical Eduction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Klaw v. New York Press Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kenerson v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- East v. Endicott Forging & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Wien & Malkin, L. L. P. v. WichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Zakarias v. Radio Patents Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Silverman v. NachwalterNew York Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.