Burleigh v. Bevin
New York Supreme Court
Demubbeb to complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that there is a defect of parties defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to recover of the defendants one-third of the loss alleged to have been sustained by him in a stock speculation in which he, Albert 0. Cheney (defendants’ testator) and Warner Miller were equally interested. The defendants .have- demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute' a cause of action, and that there is a defect of parties defendant. The complaint charges that Cheney, Miller and the plaintiff entered into an agreement to buy, for the purpose of reselling at a profit, certain stock of the Chicago,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Musier v. TrumpbourNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Wheeler v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Equity Gas-Light Co. v. McKeigeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teall v. RoeserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Bigelow v. McMillinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Cecil v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hoffman v. MittlemannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Auld v. EstridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1976