Silverman v. Nachwalter
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.
Plaintiffs ask an examination of defendants to enable them to frame a complaint in an action begun by them by the service of a summons. There are two groups of defendants, to wit, the three individuals so designated and the corporate defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company. By stipulation the time of the former to appear and answer was extended to a date subsequent to the motion herein and no point of plaintiffs’ asserted default in respect to the service of a complaint is raised by them. Defendant Gas Company assorts, however, that it served a notice of appearance in the action on May 31, 1956,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peterman v. SchpelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Teall v. RoeserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Blasser v. Morrisania Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fotomat Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Kabes v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1958