Legal Opinion

Kenerson v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

After commencing this action plaintiff applied for an order to examine the defendants “ to ascertain the facts ” for the purpose of preparing a complaint and the application has been denied at Special Term.

For many years plaintiff was employed by the defendant Morse Chain Co. In 1933 he was elected a director, vice-president, treasurer, and general manager. The complete control of the company since 1929 was held by Borg-Warner Corporation of Illinois, of which the individual defendant Davis is the president.

On May 22, 1945, plaintiff resigned as general manager and treasurer of the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterman v. SchpelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Teall v. RoeserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Beikirch v. LoebsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Newman v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Ashton v. Baker Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Gleich v. KissingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. East v. Endicott Forging & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Cotler v. Retail Credit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. In re RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API