Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Law

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 2007No. SC 17892PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The plaintiff, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs appeal from the decision of the defendant, Pamela Law, the commissioner of revenue services, denying the plaintiffs claim for a refund of state sales tax it had paid to consumers pursuant to General Stat utes § 42-179 (d), 1 a part of what is commonly known as the state’s lemon law. See General Statutes §§ 42-179 through 42-190. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that its claims were barred by sovereign immunity because it…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Turner v. BoyleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  5. May v. CoffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API