Legal Opinion

Nieves v. Bruno Sherman Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1981PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This case implicates an extension of Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc., 86 N.J. 332 (1981), decided this day. We there held that where one corporation acquires all or substantially all the manufacturing assets of another corporation, even if exclusively for cash, and undertakes essentially the same manufacturing operation as the selling corporation, the purchasing corporation is strictly liable for injuries caused by defects in units of the same product line, even if previously manufactured and distributed by the selling corporation or its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. David Dayton v. Peck, Stow and Wilcox Co. (Pexto)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Fish v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ayala v. V & O Press Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Mettinger v. Globe Slicing MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API