Legal Opinion

Fish v. Amsted Industries, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1985No. 84-1254PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Manitowoc county, Honorable Fred H. Hazelwood, circuit judge, granting the Defendants’, Amsted Industries, Inc. (Amsted) and South Bend Lathe, Inc. (South Bend II), motion for summary judgment on Emily and Rodney Fish’s (Plaintiffs) claim of corporate successor liability. We accepted the case upon certification from the court of appeals. This case raises the following issues: Is there sufficient “identity” between the predecessor corporation which manufactured the allegedly defective punch press (Bontrager) and either or both of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Columbia Propane, L.P. v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Guzman v. MRM/ELGIN WILLCOX & GIBBS, INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. McCarthy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API