Legal Opinion
David Dayton v. Peck, Stow and Wilcox Co. (Pexto)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 30, 1984No. 83-1415PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant brought this product liability suit for personal injuries he suffered in 1976 while operating a metal shearing machine manufactured by Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. (PSW-1). Appellees Veeder Industries, Inc. (Veeder) and Western Pacific Industries, Inc. (Western Pacific) are two of the four defendant corporations from which appellant seeks to recover damages. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. The district court granted the motions of both appellees for summary judgment on the ground that neither corporation was liable as. PSW-l’s successor…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Joy v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Corporate Technologies, Inc. v. HarnettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.