State Ex Rel. Smith v. Hummel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The first question presented is whether a writ of prohibition is the proper remedy. In the case of State, ex rel. Stanley, v. Bernon et al., Bd. of Elections of Cuyahoga County, 127 Ohio St., 204, 187 N. E., 733, it was held that such a writ will lie to prevent a board of elections from placing on a ballot the names of the candidates whose nominating petitions have not been filed within the time prescribed by statute. In the instant case the writ is sought to prevent placing the names of candidates for nomination for sheriff of Summit county for the unexpired term on the primary ballot, upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Patton v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. BernonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Haff v. PaskOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State ex rel Freeman v. CarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Townsley v. HartsfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Beaver Excavating Co. v. Stark County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Youngs v. Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- State ex rel. Masterson v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.