Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Bernon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1933No. 24431PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The first question presented is whether the relatrix has mistaken her remedy in asking relief in the form of a writ of prohibition.

This court is of the view that there is little difference between the principles involved in this case and in the cases of State, ex rel. Patton, v. Myers, Secy. of State, ante, 95, 186 N. E., 872, and State, ex rel. Donnelly, v. Myers, Secy. of State, ante, 104, 186 N. E., 918. It is of course true that in the latter cases the respondent was the secretary of state, instead of a board of elections ; but it is equally apparent that in many respects a board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Patton v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Buckner v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  3. State Ex Rel. Cherrington v. HutsinpillerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Donnelly v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Franklin v. WestfallIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cripps v. Seneca County Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API