Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1995No. 1995-0294PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 69.] THE STATE EX REL. YOUNGSTOWN ET AL. v. MAHONING COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. Of Elections,

1995-Ohio-184.] Mandamus ordering and writ of prohibition restraining Mahoning County Board of Elections and its members not to conduct or hold a primary or general election until 1997 for the office of member of Youngstown City Council denied, when. (No. 95-294—Submitted March 21, 1995—Decided March 30, 1995.) IN MANDAMUS and PROHIBITION. __________________ {¶ 1} In…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Nease v. Medical College HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Whitman v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Wilkinson v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Tatman v. Fairfield County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Commt. for the Charter Amendment, City Trash Collection v. WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API