Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haff v. Pask

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1933No. 23913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The relator claims that Pask was ineligible to be a candidate in the election of November 8, 1932, because of the fact that Section 3, Article X, of the Constitution of Ohio, provides that “no person shall be eligible to the office of Sheriff, or County-Treasurer, for more than four years, in any period of sis years.” With this contention we are in accord.

The following are standard definitions of the word “eligibility”:

Black: “Capable of being chosen;” “competency to hold the office if chosen.”

Bouvier and Anderson: “This term relates to the capacity of holding as well as that of being elected…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Schuet v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mehling v. MooreheadOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State ex rel. Halak v. CebulaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. The State Ex Rel. Flanagan v. Lucas, SheriffOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Kirk v. WheatleyOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Gahl v. LutzOhio Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API