Hutton v. Sherrard
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Codd, J. . Bill by George E. Hutton and another against Charlotte Berry Sherrard and others for specific performanee of a contract. From a decree for defendants, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
In June, 1905, complainants entered into an agreement with. Joseph Berry of' Detroit, whereby they were to act as his, selling agents, for a period of two years, of certain lots owned by him in Fairview village. Certain preliminary work was necessary to get the lots ready for the market, and it was stipulated that complainants should look after this work, such as grading roads, planting trees, and constructing sidewalks, the cost of which was to be borne by Mr. Berry. The cost of advertising and selling and making collections on deferred payments was to be borne by complainants. Lots were to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Isbell v. Anderson Carriage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- McKay v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hartford Sorghum Manufacturing Co. v. BrushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- McNutt v. DixMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Knight v. Northpointe BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Busam Motor Sales v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Gray v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Allen v. DaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Holton v. Monarch Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.