Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Jackson. (Huntington, J.) Assumpstt. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
This action was brought origiually before a justice of the peace. The pleadings were put in orally. The declaration was stated as being “ on all the common counts in assumpsit and on a written contract by which defendant agreed to buy and receive from plaintiff a certain agricultural machine for the sum of three hundred dollars; claim, $300 or under damages.” The defendant stated that he pleaded the general issue and gave notice of proof that the machine did not answer the requirements of the contract.” ,
The mention of a written contract referred to three simultaneous writings. First, a paper…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hart v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Rossiter v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
3Cited by74 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Brydon ex rel. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.