Legal Opinion

Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1883PublishedCited by 74 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Huntington, J.) Assumpstt. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

This action was brought origiually before a justice of the peace. The pleadings were put in orally. The declaration was stated as being “ on all the common counts in assumpsit and on a written contract by which defendant agreed to buy and receive from plaintiff a certain agricultural machine for the sum of three hundred dollars; claim, $300 or under damages.” The defendant stated that he pleaded the general issue and gave notice of proof that the machine did not answer the requirements of the contract.” ,

The mention of a written contract referred to three simultaneous writings. First, a paper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Hart v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Rossiter v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Brydon ex rel. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  2. Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API