Holton v. Monarch Motor Car Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mayne, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Hoover Holton and another against the Monarch Motor Car Company for breach of a contract of agency. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiffs entered into a written contract with defendant in June, 1914, which gave them the right to sell defendant’s motor cars in United States and Canada, for a period commencing on July 1, 1914, and ending on June 30, 1915. Plaintiffs entered at once upon the work of selling cars, establishing agencies and obtaining contracts from dealers, and at the same time expended in various forms of advertising the sum of $5,037.06. On September 16, 1914, defendant wrote plaintiffs the following letter, canceling the contract:
“In consideration of the fact that the present 4-cyl-inder model is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Mueller v. Bethesda Mineral Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Oliver v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Isbell v. Anderson Carriage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Calkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Callender v. Myers Regulator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.