Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Anderson Carriage Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1912No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Assumpsit by William G. Isbell against the Anderson Carriage Company for breach of a contract of agency. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This action is brought by William G. Isbell against the Anderson Carriage Company to recover damages for the alleged breach, by wrongful termination, of a contract giving plaintiff and one George D. Grant the agency for sale of defendant’s electric automobiles during a period of five years. . At the time of entering into said contract, the plaintiff and said Grant associated as partners in the enterprise, and-, as parties of the second part, agreed by this contract to ‘ ‘ establish the Anderson Electric Agency for the exclusive sale and care of the electric automobiles which are made by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Mueller v. Bethesda Mineral Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Koehler v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fera v. Village Plaza, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hutton v. SherrardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Schmand v. JandorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API