Legal Opinion
Moseley v. Searcy
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 11, 1962No. 49125PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HYDE, Judge.
Action to declare title in plaintiffs to real estate which is part of a tract designated as a park on a plat of an addition to Jefferson City. Because of the large number of lot owners in this addition, suit was brought as a class action and lot owners in each block were made defendants to represent the class. Appellants (hereinafter called intervenors), lot owners who questioned the selection of the class representatives made by plaintiffs, were permitted to intervene. The court found for plaintiffs and declared them owners in fee simple. Intervenors have appealed.
Defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Neil v. Independent Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Byam v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Downend v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Goode v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Prewitt v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Weakley v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- McIntosh v. City of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.