Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. City of Joplin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1972No. 9247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, Myron and Mary McIntosh, petitioned the Circuit Court of Jasper County to enjoin and restrain the City of Joplin from the use of their alleged private sewer in Warnick Subdivision “until proper proceedings have been taken by law and until the damages to plaintiffs in consequence of the appropriation [of plaintiffs’ sewer by the city] have been ascertained and paid to plaintiffs.” The court denied plaintiffs an injunction and they appealed.

Warnick Subdivision was dedicated by plaintiffs as a part of the City of Joplin and approved as such by the city. No sanitary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Prior v. Buehler & Cooney Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Kammeyer v. Concordia Telephone CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. McShane v. City of MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Playboy Club, Inc. v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Freeze v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. TINNES v. BrandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API